Lente Sigma F1.8 Art DC HSM de 18 a 35 mm para Canon, negro (210101)

As a photographer, finding the right lens is essential to capturing stunning visuals, and I've found that the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art DC HSM Lens for Canon truly stands out in this regard. Here's why I believe this lens should be the first purchase for anyone looking to elevate their photography:Exceptional Quality: The Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 lens provides crystal clear images with minimal chromatic aberration. The colors are vibrant, and the sharpness is top-notch. Whether you're a professional or a hobbyist, this lens will help you take your images to the next level.Fast Aperture: With an aperture of F1.8, this lens allows for fantastic low-light performance. It's great for creating beautiful bokeh, giving you that professional touch to your portraits and other creative works.Versatile Focal

Everything you've read about this lens is true. Most would call the end result "dreamy". I would call it sensuous. You can almost feel the captured scene. This lens is truly amazing, even more so that it's reasonably priced.I did find however that there are 3 issues with this lens only if you want to make video.1. It has some heavy breathing when in AF mode. I want to use AF since I'm mainly filming 3 small children running around. There is no way I could keep anything in focus using MF. This issue would not affect photography.2. The AF also makes a pretty disgusting noise that is audible within your video. This issue would not affect photography.3. This isn't the fault of the lens, but you cannot mount this lens on the Weebill Lab gimbal. It's just too dang big. You could use a larger …

I recently got my Panasonic GH4 and was told this was the go to lens for most shooters with this camera. I did my research and found out this lens becomes a 1.2 with the metabones adapter.. I had to try it out. I purchased this used right here from amazon for a few hundred dollars cheaper and I couldn't tell that the lens wasn't brand new.. It came with not a single mark on it and worked as If nobody ever used it. I'm assuming someone returned it once they found out it was a cropped sensor and wouldn't work properly on a Full Frame Camera. Luckily for me, the GH4 isn't full framed and it worked and looks amazing.The lens is verrrrry sharp even wide open at 1.2 I was shocked! It doesn't have IS but that doesn't effect me because I use a glidecam or tripod, you'll only see a little shake …

Recently bought this Sigma 18-35 F1.8 Art lens (Canon Mount) for my Lumix GH4 and connecting the two with my Metabones Speed Booster. I film a lot of weddings here in Cape Town, South Africa and I needed a lens that was good for "run and gun" shooting. After testing it out quite a bit and shooting a wedding with it, I was pleasantly surprised with just how sharp this lens is! Like.. WOW! I've been a big believer for a long time that zoom lenses just aren't the way to go, because you just don't get the image quality or the sharpness that you do with a prime lens. But this lens might be sharper than some primes that I've been using for a few years now!It is a rather heavy lens though, and coming from a place of using small film camera prime lenses like the Nikkor 50mm F1.8, It took awhile …

I bought this lens as the final leg of an awesome trifecta... Panny GH4, Metabones Speed Booster and yep... SIGMA 18-35 F1.8. This is an awesome combination and it's done everything I've asked of it thus far. Just for the heck of it I put the SIGMA on my T3i to see how it compared to my Canon 17-55 2.8 EFS. I didn't do the kind of testing you see some folks do on YouTube, etc. but there seemed to be considerably less chromatic aberration around edges as compared to the Canon. I primarily shoot video and if the SIGMA had OIS I probably would have given it five stars. Be warned, it IS heavy and I do miss the range compared to the Canon but the image quality is superior. Like most photo and video equipment, whether or not this lens is for you depends on how you plan on using it. I see a lot …

I'm an amateur photographer, and as such, I appreciate the versatility that this lens gives me. First, the wide aperture at a wide angle, something that is hard to find even on primes, and second, the fact that is not a prime lens and allows you a certain degree on zooming, albeit not much. but who would ask for more of this.Ok, but if you're on this page you already know what's the appeal of this lens, you just want to know if it's worth it. My verdict is: it is worth it. The build quality is great, as is its visual appearance. It's a professional-looking lens. And the feel in your hands is amazing. The zoom and focus rings are smooth to handle, and with a very nice grip thanks to the rubberized surface. The image quality is very nice, comparable to prime lenses they say. I don't have …

Before purchasing this lens, I decided to rent it for a couple of days and see how well it performed. I used it to take photos for a local late night talk show and it left me very impressed.As many reviews on the internet and youtube might tell you, this lens is super sharp. I never thought I would want to take photos at the widest aperture of f/1.8 but I was so enthralled at how sharp it was wide open. It was matched up to my Canon 70D and it performed well past my expectations. Previously I was stuck with using my Canon 17-55mm f/2.8, which is still a very good lens, but this Sigma trumps any photo I've taken when it comes to clarity, contrast, and sharpness.The only true gripes I might have about this lens, is the short focal range and the speed of the auto focus. My Canon 70D has an …

This is a review I expect to update as I continue to use my brand new Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 lens. I am not a super-technical pixel-peeper kind of guy but I am a pretty experienced photographer and I'm writing this with a similar audience in mind. I bought this lens because I do a lot of event photography, especially dance (doing volunteer work for a ballet company) and while I've done pretty well with my trusty Canon 24-70mm F2.8 lens, I've felt a bit (sometimes more than a bit) limited when I photograph fast moving dance sequences in the low-light environments stage and dance very often are. That's because the 24-70mm F2.8 simply doesn't do as well on an EOS 7D with its 1.6x (APS-C) crop that it does on a full-frame like my EOS 5D Mark III.That's what's one of the very nice things about …